Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 521: Guide for Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems – Edition 6

$

682

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 653: Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction – Edition 4

$

507

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:19 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series-18: Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z246.2-14 – Emergency preparedness and response for petroleum and natural gas industry systems

$

596

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:22 – Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z731-09 (R2014) – Emergency Preparedness and Response

$

177

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:23 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:26 – Storage of Hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA B51:24 Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Pressure Piping Code

$

389

BUY NOW

ISO 16710:2024

ISO 16710:2024 Ergonomics methods – Part 1: Feedback method – A method to understand how end users perform their work with machines

CDN $295.00

SKU: d80f7ca80a99 Category:

Description

This document describes the “Feedback Method”, a method designed specifically to collect the contribution of machinery end-users by reconstructing and understanding how work is actually performed (i.e. the real work). This method can help to improve technical standards, as well as the design, manufacturing, and use of machinery.

By collecting the experiences of skilled users, this method can be used to reconstruct their actual work activities under different operating conditions and with any kind of machine. This helps to identify all the critical aspects having an impact on health and safety, or associated with ergonomic principles. Moreover, it makes it possible to identify some basic elements for defining the standards for machines and for their revision and improvement. It can also improve production efficiency and identify any need for additional study and research.

The method is designed to minimize the influence of the subjectivity of the facilitators and researchers in reconstructing and describing the reality of work, and to maximize the “objective” contribution of the skilled users of the machine.

The method combines a high level of reproducibility, sensitivity, and user-friendliness with low demands in term of resources, which makes it attractive to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.

This document is addressed to standards writers, designers and manufacturers, employers-buyers, end users, craftsmen and workers, market surveillance and authorities.

Edition

1

Published Date

2024-09-30

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

31

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document describes the “Feedback Method”, a method designed specifically to collect the contribution of machinery end-users by reconstructing and understanding how work is actually performed (i.e. the real work). This method can help to improve technical standards, as well as the design, manufacturing, and use of machinery.

By collecting the experiences of skilled users, this method can be used to reconstruct their actual work activities under different operating conditions and with any kind of machine. This helps to identify all the critical aspects having an impact on health and safety, or associated with ergonomic principles. Moreover, it makes it possible to identify some basic elements for defining the standards for machines and for their revision and improvement. It can also improve production efficiency and identify any need for additional study and research.

The method is designed to minimize the influence of the subjectivity of the facilitators and researchers in reconstructing and describing the reality of work, and to maximize the “objective” contribution of the skilled users of the machine.

The method combines a high level of reproducibility, sensitivity, and user-friendliness with low demands in term of resources, which makes it attractive to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.

This document is addressed to standards writers, designers and manufacturers, employers-buyers, end users, craftsmen and workers, market surveillance and authorities.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: