Sky Bear Technical Standards - Home
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

TEMA 2026 Edition – Online Subscription Only

$

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 15SIH, 2nd Edition: Installation and Handling of Spoolable Reinforced Plastic Line Pipe

$

158

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 754, 4th Edition: Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries

$

393

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ASME B31.1-2020: Power Piping

$

668

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ASME B31.1-2022: Power Piping

$

668

BUY NOW

ISO 22930:2020

ISO 22930:2020 Evaluating the performance of continuous air monitors – Part 2: Air monitors based on flow-through sampling techniques without accumulation

CDN $307.00

SKU: c86cc6b575f6 Category:

Description

The use of a continuous air monitor (CAM) is mainly motivated by the need to be alerted quickly and in the most accurate way possible with an acceptable false alarm rate when significant activity concentration value is exceeded, in order to take appropriate measures to reduce exposure of those involved.

The performance of this CAM does not only depend on the metrological aspect characterized by the decision threshold, the limit of detection and the measurement uncertainties but also on its dynamic capacity characterized by its response time as well as on the minimum detectable activity concentration corresponding to an acceptable false alarm rate.

The ideal performance is to have a minimum detectable activity concentration as low as possible associated with a very short response time, but unfortunately these two criteria are in opposition. It is therefore important that the CAM and the choice of the adjustment parameters and the alarm levels be in line with the radiation protection objectives.

This document describes

– the dynamic behaviour and the determination of the response time,

– the determination of the characteristic limits (decision threshold, detection limit, limits of the coverage interval), and

– a possible way to determine the minimum detectable activity concentration and the alarms setup.

Finally the annexes of this document show actual examples of CAM data which illustrate how to quantify the CAM performance by determining the response time, the characteristics limits, the minimum detectable activity concentration and the alarms setup.

Edition

1

Published Date

2020-05-07

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

32

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

The use of a continuous air monitor (CAM) is mainly motivated by the need to be alerted quickly and in the most accurate way possible with an acceptable false alarm rate when significant activity concentration value is exceeded, in order to take appropriate measures to reduce exposure of those involved.

The performance of this CAM does not only depend on the metrological aspect characterized by the decision threshold, the limit of detection and the measurement uncertainties but also on its dynamic capacity characterized by its response time as well as on the minimum detectable activity concentration corresponding to an acceptable false alarm rate.

The ideal performance is to have a minimum detectable activity concentration as low as possible associated with a very short response time, but unfortunately these two criteria are in opposition. It is therefore important that the CAM and the choice of the adjustment parameters and the alarm levels be in line with the radiation protection objectives.

This document describes

- the dynamic behaviour and the determination of the response time,

- the determination of the characteristic limits (decision threshold, detection limit, limits of the coverage interval), and

- a possible way to determine the minimum detectable activity concentration and the alarms setup.

Finally the annexes of this document show actual examples of CAM data which illustrate how to quantify the CAM performance by determining the response time, the characteristics limits, the minimum detectable activity concentration and the alarms setup.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: