Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-6 Chapter 6 – Density

$

204

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 560: Fired Heaters for General Refinery Services

$

721

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 64: Diverter Equipment Systems

$

324

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 17.10.1: Refrigerated Light Hydrocarbon Fluids – Measurement of Cargoes on Board LNG Carries

$

417

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 13B-1: Testing Water-based Drilling Fluids

$

418

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-12 Chapter 12 – Thermal Conductivity

$

214

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API 16FI Frac Iron Guidelines and Requirements

$

129

BUY NOW

ISO 10360:2020

ISO 10360:2020 Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring systems (CMS) – Part 5: Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) using single and multiple stylus contacting probing systems using discrete point and/or scanning measuring mode

CDN $312.00

SKU: f6ada579e7ae Categories: ,

Description

This document specifies acceptance and periodic reverification tests of CMM performance with contacting probing systems and is only applicable to CMMs using:

– any type of contacting probing system; and

– spherical or hemispherical stylus tip(s).

NOTE CMM probing performance tests are specified by the maximum permissible errors (MPEs), due to the impracticality of isolating the performance of the probing system from that of the CMM, even on a small artefact such as a test sphere.

This document applies to CMMs supplied with any of the following:

a) single-stylus probing systems;

b) multi-stylus probing systems with fixed multiple styli attached to a single probe (e.g. “star” stylus);

c) multiple probing systems such as those with a stylus for each of their probes;

d) systems with articulating probing systems;

e) stylus and probe changing systems;

f) manual (non-driven) and automated CMMs;

g) installations including a scanning probe, capable of being used in a scanning mode.

This document is not applicable to non-contacting probing systems, which require different testing procedures.

The term ?combined CMM and multi-stylus probing system size error’ has been shortened to ?multi-stylus size error’ for convenience. This applies in similar cases.

If it is desirable to isolate the probing system performance as far as is practical, the influence of the CMM can be minimized but not eliminated. See Annex C for more information.

Edition

3

Published Date

2020-03-31

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

42

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document specifies acceptance and periodic reverification tests of CMM performance with contacting probing systems and is only applicable to CMMs using:

- any type of contacting probing system; and

- spherical or hemispherical stylus tip(s).

NOTE CMM probing performance tests are specified by the maximum permissible errors (MPEs), due to the impracticality of isolating the performance of the probing system from that of the CMM, even on a small artefact such as a test sphere.

This document applies to CMMs supplied with any of the following:

a) single-stylus probing systems;

b) multi-stylus probing systems with fixed multiple styli attached to a single probe (e.g. "star" stylus);

c) multiple probing systems such as those with a stylus for each of their probes;

d) systems with articulating probing systems;

e) stylus and probe changing systems;

f) manual (non-driven) and automated CMMs;

g) installations including a scanning probe, capable of being used in a scanning mode.

This document is not applicable to non-contacting probing systems, which require different testing procedures.

The term ?combined CMM and multi-stylus probing system size error' has been shortened to ?multi-stylus size error' for convenience. This applies in similar cases.

If it is desirable to isolate the probing system performance as far as is practical, the influence of the CMM can be minimized but not eliminated. See Annex C for more information.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: