Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 521: Guide for Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems – Edition 6

$

682

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 653: Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction – Edition 4

$

507

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:19 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series-18: Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z246.2-14 – Emergency preparedness and response for petroleum and natural gas industry systems

$

596

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:22 – Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z731-09 (R2014) – Emergency Preparedness and Response

$

177

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:23 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:26 – Storage of Hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA B51:24 Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Pressure Piping Code

$

389

BUY NOW

ISO 15901:2016

ISO 15901:2016 Evaluation of pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption – Part 1: Mercury porosimetry

CDN $251.00

SKU: 5e584eb59ebf Categories: ,

Description

ISO 15901-1:2016 describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter and Drake[1][2]. It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter.

Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa (60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general, without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper, nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.

Edition

2

Published Date

2016-04-04

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

19

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 15901-1:2016 describes a method for the evaluation of the pore size distribution and the specific surface area of pores in solids by mercury porosimetry according to the method of Ritter and Drake[1][2]. It is a comparative test, usually destructive due to mercury contamination, in which the volume of mercury penetrating a pore or void is determined as a function of an applied hydrostatic pressure, which can be related to a pore diameter.

Practical considerations presently limit the maximum applied absolute pressure to about 400 MPa (60 000 psi) corresponding to a minimum equivalent pore diameter of approximately 4 nm. The maximum diameter is limited for samples having a significant depth due to the difference in hydrostatic head of mercury from the top to the bottom of the sample. For the most purposes, this limit can be regarded as 400 µm. The measurements cover inter-particle and intra-particle porosity. In general, without additional information from other methods it is difficult to distinguish between these porosities where they co-exist. The method is suitable for the study of most porous materials non-wettable by mercury. Samples that amalgamate with mercury, such as certain metals, e.g. gold, aluminium, copper, nickel and silver, can be unsuitable with this technique or can require a preliminary passivation. Under the applied pressure some materials are deformed, compacted or destroyed, whereby open pores may be collapsed and closed pores opened. In some cases it may be possible to apply sample compressibility corrections and useful comparative data may still be obtainable. For these reasons, the mercury porosimetry technique is considered to be comparative.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: