Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 521: Guide for Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems – Edition 6

$

682

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 653: Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction – Edition 4

$

507

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:19 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series-18: Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z246.2-14 – Emergency preparedness and response for petroleum and natural gas industry systems

$

596

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:22 – Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z731-09 (R2014) – Emergency Preparedness and Response

$

177

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:23 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:26 – Storage of Hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA B51:24 Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Pressure Piping Code

$

389

BUY NOW

ISO 27306:2016

ISO 27306:2016 Metallic materials – Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components

CDN $336.00

SKU: 980d0767fec5 Category:

Description

In fracture assessments of steel structures containing cracks, it has generally been assumed that the fracture resistance of fracture toughness specimens is equal to the fracture resistance of structural components. However, such an assumption often leads to excessively conservative fracture assessments. This is due to a loss of plastic constraint in structural components, which are subjected mainly to tensile loading. By contrast, fracture toughness specimens hold a constrained stress state near the crack-tip due to bending mode. The loss of constraint is significant for high strength steels with high yield-to-tensile ratios (= yield stress/tensile strength) which have been extensively developed and widely applied to structures in recent years.

ISO 27306:2016 specifies a method for converting the CTOD (crack-tip opening displacement) fracture toughness obtained from laboratory specimens to an equivalent CTOD for structural components, taking constraint loss into account. This method can also apply to fracture assessment using the stress intensity factor or the J-integral concept (see Clause 9).

ISO 27306:2016 deals with the unstable fracture that occurs from a crack-like defect or fatigue crack in ferritic structural steels. Unstable fracture accompanied by a significant amount of ductile crack extension and ductile fractures are not included in the scope hereof.

The CTOD fracture toughness of structural steels is measured in accordance with the established test methods, ISO 12135[1] or BS 7448-1. The fracture assessment of a cracked component is done using an established method such as FAD (Failure Assessment Diagram) in the organization concerned, and reference is not made to the details thereof in ISO 27306:2016.

It can be used for eliminating the excessive conservatism frequently associated with the conventional fracture mechanics methods and accurately assessing the unstable fracture initiation limit of structural components from the fracture toughness of the structural steel. This is also used for rationally determining the fracture toughness of materials to meet the design requirements of performance of structural components.

Edition

2

Published Date

2016-09-19

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

49

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

In fracture assessments of steel structures containing cracks, it has generally been assumed that the fracture resistance of fracture toughness specimens is equal to the fracture resistance of structural components. However, such an assumption often leads to excessively conservative fracture assessments. This is due to a loss of plastic constraint in structural components, which are subjected mainly to tensile loading. By contrast, fracture toughness specimens hold a constrained stress state near the crack-tip due to bending mode. The loss of constraint is significant for high strength steels with high yield-to-tensile ratios (= yield stress/tensile strength) which have been extensively developed and widely applied to structures in recent years.

ISO 27306:2016 specifies a method for converting the CTOD (crack-tip opening displacement) fracture toughness obtained from laboratory specimens to an equivalent CTOD for structural components, taking constraint loss into account. This method can also apply to fracture assessment using the stress intensity factor or the J-integral concept (see Clause 9).

ISO 27306:2016 deals with the unstable fracture that occurs from a crack-like defect or fatigue crack in ferritic structural steels. Unstable fracture accompanied by a significant amount of ductile crack extension and ductile fractures are not included in the scope hereof.

The CTOD fracture toughness of structural steels is measured in accordance with the established test methods, ISO 12135[1] or BS 7448-1. The fracture assessment of a cracked component is done using an established method such as FAD (Failure Assessment Diagram) in the organization concerned, and reference is not made to the details thereof in ISO 27306:2016.

It can be used for eliminating the excessive conservatism frequently associated with the conventional fracture mechanics methods and accurately assessing the unstable fracture initiation limit of structural components from the fracture toughness of the structural steel. This is also used for rationally determining the fracture toughness of materials to meet the design requirements of performance of structural components.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: