Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

TEMA 11th Edition – Book of Standards (Not for Resale)

$

0

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 22040-3:2025 Life cycle management of concrete structures — Part 3: Execution stage

$

125

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 2382-19:1989 Information processing systems — Vocabulary — Part 19: Analog computing

$

0

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 6490-1:1985 Animal feeding stuffs — Determination of calcium content — Part 1: Titrimetric method

$

82

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 8536-6:2025 Infusion equipment for medical use — Part 6: Freeze drying closures for infusion bottles

$

186

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 21702:2019 Measurement of antiviral activity on plastics and other non-porous surfaces

$

289

BUY NOW

API TR 579-B

API TR 579-B: KPECE2 Influence Coefficients Study

CDN $123.00

This publication was last reviewed and confirmed in 2026.

Description

This research study provides background information that may be used to revise the Fitness-For-Service (FFS) document,
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 (aka “API 579”), more specifically the Part 9 Level 2 Assessment, along with a new Level 3 option for Part 9.

The Part 9 Level 2 crack-like flaw FFS procedure relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach, which is the most widely used crack assessment methodology in the world. Several industry standards for crack assessment implement the FAD approach, including BS 7910 from the British Standards Institute and the R6 document from the British nuclear power generation industry.

The FAD approach was first introduced in 1976 as a simple approximation for fracture stability assessment of structural components that experience plastic deformation prior to failure. Modern industry standards use improved versions of the FAD, but the approach still contains approximations and simplifications.

The main purpose of the present work is to remove some of the approximations in the existing Part 9 Level 2 FAD procedure and thereby improve accuracy. A side benefit of this work is a new Level 3 option that is even more accurate than the improved Level 2 procedure. This study includes a large number of 3D elastic plastic Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of components with cracks.

 

Edition

1

Published Date

2026-05-02

Status

Current

Pages

49

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This research study provides background information that may be used to revise the Fitness-For-Service (FFS) document, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 (aka “API 579”), more specifically the Part 9 Level 2 Assessment, along with a new Level 3 option for Part 9. The Part 9 Level 2 crack-like flaw FFS procedure relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach, which is the most widely used crack assessment methodology in the world. Several industry standards for crack assessment implement the FAD approach, including BS 7910 from the British Standards Institute and the R6 document from the British nuclear power generation industry. The FAD approach was first introduced in 1976 as a simple approximation for fracture stability assessment of structural components that experience plastic deformation prior to failure. Modern industry standards use improved versions of the FAD, but the approach still contains approximations and simplifications. The main purpose of the present work is to remove some of the approximations in the existing Part 9 Level 2 FAD procedure and thereby improve accuracy. A side benefit of this work is a new Level 3 option that is even more accurate than the improved Level 2 procedure. This study includes a large number of 3D elastic plastic Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of components with cracks.  

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: