Sky Bear Technical Standards - Home
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA A123.21:26 – Standard test method for the dynamic wind uplift resistance of membrane-roofing systems

$

236

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CAN/CSA-A123.2-03 (R2023) – Asphalt-coated roofing sheets

$

150

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

A123.23-15 (R2025) – Product specification for polymer-modified bitumen sheet, prefabricated and reinforced

$

118

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA A123.24:21 (R2026) – Standard test method for wind resistance of vegetated roof assembly

$

161

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA A123.25:18 (R2023) – Asphalt core boards used in roofing

$

197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

A123.3-05 (R2020) – Asphalt saturated organic roofing felt

$

150

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CAN/CSA-A123.4-04 (R2023) – Asphalt for constructing built-up roof coverings and waterproofing systems

$

150

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA A123.5:16 (R2020) – Asphalt shingles made from glass felt and surfaced with mineral granules

$

197

BUY NOW

CSA A14:07 (R2022)

CSA A14:07 (R2022) – Concrete poles

CDN $236.00

Concrete poles

SKU: 2418962 Categories: ,

Description

Preface This is the eighth edition of CSA A14, Concrete poles . It supersedes the previous editions published in 2000, 1979, 1965, 1959, 1953, 1939, and 1924. When the first edition of this Standard was published, wood poles were always specified by class, and the class number implied a certain bending strength. This was the only structural property quantitatively defined. Because concrete poles were considered at that time to be alternatives to wood poles, the first and all subsequent editions of this Standard also included the concept of definition by class for concrete poles. Although the class values were different from those used for wood poles, the principal structural property defined was still the ultimate lateral force bending the pole. Experience has shown that defining strength by class and appropriately labelling the poles is useful to both manufacturers and users. This edition still includes the classes that the earlier editions referred to, and the class tip loadings have not been changed. Users accustomed to buying poles by class will be able to continue to do so, in accordance with their previous practices. However, there are now many new applications for which the utilitarian class definition, by itself, is not sufficient. In the seventh edition of this Standard, clauses were added so that purchasers requiring poles with higher-than-normal torsion, durability, or stiffness or with ornamental finishes could define their special needs and still purchase a pole that met the requirements of that edition. The same approach is followed in the current edition of this Standard. As was the case with previous editions, the current edition of this Standard does not address how the strength or other properties of a particular application should be established. Designers of installations need to rely on their own expertise or the expertise of others to determine such requirements. This Standard was prepared by the Technical Committee on Concrete Poles, under the jurisdiction of the Strategic Steering Committee on Concrete Structures, and has been formally approved by the Technical Committee. It will be submitted to the Standards Council of Canada for approval as a National Standard of Canada. Scope 1.1 This Standard specifies requirements for the design, manufacture, and quality control of all types of concrete poles. 1.2 This Standard applies to poles manufactured using the casting and spinning processes. 1.3 This Standard does not address the rules for (a) determining the required strength or other functional properties of pole applications; or (b) choosing a particular class of pole or property of a pole. 1.4 This Standard addresses certain special structural, architectural, and other functional properties of (a) extra-stiff poles; (b) ornamental poles; (c) high-torsion poles; (d) poles subject to severe exposure; and (e) poles with specified cracking loads. 1.5 This Standard does not address the vertical load capacity of poles. Note: Concrete poles have a substantial, inherent vertical load capacity, which, in general, is much larger than that of wood poles. Annex A provides formulas for calculating the vertical capacity under different conditions of restraint. When the conditions of restraint are known, a manufacturer can supply a pole of suitable proportions, but this is a contractual matter beyond the scope of this Standard. 1.6 In CSA Standards, “shall” is used to express a requirement, i.e., a provision that the user is obliged to satisfy in order to comply with the standard; “should” is used to express a recommendation or that which is advised but not required; “may” is used to express an option or that which is permissible within the limits of the standard; and “can” is used to express possibility or capability. Notes accompanying clauses do not include requirements or alternative requirements; the purpose of a note accompanying a clause is to separate from the text explanatory or informative material. Notes to tables and figures are considered part of the table or figure and may be written as requirements. Annexes are designated normative (mandatory) or informative (non-mandatory) to define their application. 1.7 This Standard is written in SI units, with approximate soft conversions in yard/pound units offered in parentheses for convenience. However, because of the existence of numerous poles made to classes specified in yard/pound units and because the industry is familiar with empirical rules for choosing poles in accordance with these existing classes, the class strengths specified in Table 1are based on the traditional values expressed in pounds and the SI values are soft-converted from the yard/pound units.

Edition

Not found

Published Date

2026-10-05

Status

Not found

Pages

42

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

Preface This is the eighth edition of CSA A14, Concrete poles . It supersedes the previous editions published in 2000, 1979, 1965, 1959, 1953, 1939, and 1924. When the first edition of this Standard was published, wood poles were always specified by class, and the class number implied a certain bending strength. This was the only structural property quantitatively defined. Because concrete poles were considered at that time to be alternatives to wood poles, the first and all subsequent editions of this Standard also included the concept of definition by class for concrete poles. Although the class values were different from those used for wood poles, the principal structural property defined was still the ultimate lateral force bending the pole. Experience has shown that defining strength by class and appropriately labelling the poles is useful to both manufacturers and users. This edition still includes the classes that the earlier editions referred to, and the class tip loadings have not been changed. Users accustomed to buying poles by class will be able to continue to do so, in accordance with their previous practices. However, there are now many new applications for which the utilitarian class definition, by itself, is not sufficient. In the seventh edition of this Standard, clauses were added so that purchasers requiring poles with higher-than-normal torsion, durability, or stiffness or with ornamental finishes could define their special needs and still purchase a pole that met the requirements of that edition. The same approach is followed in the current edition of this Standard. As was the case with previous editions, the current edition of this Standard does not address how the strength or other properties of a particular application should be established. Designers of installations need to rely on their own expertise or the expertise of others to determine such requirements. This Standard was prepared by the Technical Committee on Concrete Poles, under the jurisdiction of the Strategic Steering Committee on Concrete Structures, and has been formally approved by the Technical Committee. It will be submitted to the Standards Council of Canada for approval as a National Standard of Canada. Scope 1.1 This Standard specifies requirements for the design, manufacture, and quality control of all types of concrete poles. 1.2 This Standard applies to poles manufactured using the casting and spinning processes. 1.3 This Standard does not address the rules for (a) determining the required strength or other functional properties of pole applications; or (b) choosing a particular class of pole or property of a pole. 1.4 This Standard addresses certain special structural, architectural, and other functional properties of (a) extra-stiff poles; (b) ornamental poles; (c) high-torsion poles; (d) poles subject to severe exposure; and (e) poles with specified cracking loads. 1.5 This Standard does not address the vertical load capacity of poles. Note: Concrete poles have a substantial, inherent vertical load capacity, which, in general, is much larger than that of wood poles. Annex A provides formulas for calculating the vertical capacity under different conditions of restraint. When the conditions of restraint are known, a manufacturer can supply a pole of suitable proportions, but this is a contractual matter beyond the scope of this Standard. 1.6 In CSA Standards, "shall" is used to express a requirement, i.e., a provision that the user is obliged to satisfy in order to comply with the standard; "should" is used to express a recommendation or that which is advised but not required; "may" is used to express an option or that which is permissible within the limits of the standard; and "can" is used to express possibility or capability. Notes accompanying clauses do not include requirements or alternative requirements; the purpose of a note accompanying a clause is to separate from the text explanatory or informative material. Notes to tables and figures are considered part of the table or figure and may be written as requirements. Annexes are designated normative (mandatory) or informative (non-mandatory) to define their application. 1.7 This Standard is written in SI units, with approximate soft conversions in yard/pound units offered in parentheses for convenience. However, because of the existence of numerous poles made to classes specified in yard/pound units and because the industry is familiar with empirical rules for choosing poles in accordance with these existing classes, the class strengths specified in Table 1are based on the traditional values expressed in pounds and the SI values are soft-converted from the yard/pound units.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: