Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO/TR 42505:2026 Sharing economy — Shared manufacturing — Concepts and models

$

192

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 4306-1:2026 Cranes — Vocabulary — Part 1: General

$

436

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 21316:2026 Traditional Chinese medicine — Isatis indigotica root

$

192

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

TEMA 11th Edition – Book of Standards (Not for Resale)

$

0

BUY NOW

ISO 10392:2011

ISO 10392:2011 Road vehicles – Determination of centre of gravity

CDN $195.00

SKU: 872dfa682940 Categories: ,

Description

ISO 10392:2011 specifies methods for determining the location of the centre of gravity (CG) of a road vehicle, as defined in ISO 3833. A method for determining the coordinates of the CG in the horizontal plane is provided. Two methods for determining the height of the CG above the ground are specified.

The axle lift and the stable pendulum methods are the most common methods for determining vehicle CG height. The axle lift method requires less dedicated equipment and is typically an easier and less expensive method than the stable pendulum method. The axle lift method can generally provide CG height accuracy in the range of a few percent, while the stable pendulum method can provide accuracy in the range of 0,5%.

Edition

2

Published Date

2011-03-14

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

13

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 10392:2011 specifies methods for determining the location of the centre of gravity (CG) of a road vehicle, as defined in ISO 3833. A method for determining the coordinates of the CG in the horizontal plane is provided. Two methods for determining the height of the CG above the ground are specified.

The axle lift and the stable pendulum methods are the most common methods for determining vehicle CG height. The axle lift method requires less dedicated equipment and is typically an easier and less expensive method than the stable pendulum method. The axle lift method can generally provide CG height accuracy in the range of a few percent, while the stable pendulum method can provide accuracy in the range of 0,5%.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: