Sky Bear Technical Standards - Home
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 7554-3:2026 Surgical instruments — Terms, measuring methods and test methods — Part 3: Test methods

$

192

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 41002:2026 Facility management — Development of the facility management organization

$

305

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 39004:2026 Road traffic safety — Good practice for service providers using digital platform

$

259

BUY NOW

ISO 16158:2021

ISO 16158:2021 Space systems – Avoiding collisions among orbiting objects

CDN $305.00

SKU: e18225cb45e1 Categories: ,

Description

This document is a guide for establishing essential collaborative enterprises to sustain the space environment and employ it effectively.

This document describes some widely used techniques for perceiving close approaches, estimating collision probability, estimating the cumulative probability of survival, and manoeuvring to avoid collisions.

NOTE       Satellite operators accept that all conjunction and collision assessment techniques are statistical. All suffer false positives and/or missed detections. The degree of uncertainty in the estimated outcomes is not uniform across all satellite orbits or all assessment intervals. No comparison within a feasible number of test cases can reveal the set of techniques that is uniformly most appropriate for all.

Edition

2

Published Date

2021-10-05

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

31

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document is a guide for establishing essential collaborative enterprises to sustain the space environment and employ it effectively.

This document describes some widely used techniques for perceiving close approaches, estimating collision probability, estimating the cumulative probability of survival, and manoeuvring to avoid collisions.

NOTE       Satellite operators accept that all conjunction and collision assessment techniques are statistical. All suffer false positives and/or missed detections. The degree of uncertainty in the estimated outcomes is not uniform across all satellite orbits or all assessment intervals. No comparison within a feasible number of test cases can reveal the set of techniques that is uniformly most appropriate for all.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: