Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 10.8, 3rd Edition: Standard Test Method for Sediment in Crude Oil by Membrane Filtration

$

114

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO/TR 42505:2026 Sharing economy — Shared manufacturing — Concepts and models

$

192

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 4306-1:2026 Cranes — Vocabulary — Part 1: General

$

436

BUY NOW

ISO 19289:2015

ISO 19289:2015 Air quality – Meteorology – Siting classifications for surface observing stations on land

CDN $195.00

SKU: 7c8c945479da Categories: ,

Description

ISO 19289:2015 indicates exposure rules for various sensors, but what should be done when these conditions are not fulfilled? There are sites that do not respect the recommended exposure rules. Consequently, a classification has been established to help determine the given site’s representativeness on a small scale (impact of the surrounding environment).

The classification process helps the actors and managers of a network to better take into consideration the exposure rules and thus it often improves the siting. At least, the siting environment is known and documented in the metadata. It is obviously possible and recommended to fully document the site but the risk is that a fully documented site might increase the complexity of the metadata, which would often restrict their operational use. That is why this siting classification is defined to condense the information and facilitate the operational use of this metadata information.

A site as a whole has no single classification number. Each parameter being measured at a site has its own class and is sometimes different from the others. If a global classification of a site is required, the maximum value of the parameters’ classes can be used.

In ISO 19289:2015, the classification is (occasionally) completed with an estimated uncertainty due to siting, which has to be added in the uncertainty budget of the measurement. This estimation is coming from bibliographic studies and/or some comparative tests.

The primary objective of this classification is to document the presence of obstacles close to the measurement site.

Edition

1

Published Date

2015-03-05

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

14

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 19289:2015 indicates exposure rules for various sensors, but what should be done when these conditions are not fulfilled? There are sites that do not respect the recommended exposure rules. Consequently, a classification has been established to help determine the given site's representativeness on a small scale (impact of the surrounding environment).

The classification process helps the actors and managers of a network to better take into consideration the exposure rules and thus it often improves the siting. At least, the siting environment is known and documented in the metadata. It is obviously possible and recommended to fully document the site but the risk is that a fully documented site might increase the complexity of the metadata, which would often restrict their operational use. That is why this siting classification is defined to condense the information and facilitate the operational use of this metadata information.

A site as a whole has no single classification number. Each parameter being measured at a site has its own class and is sometimes different from the others. If a global classification of a site is required, the maximum value of the parameters' classes can be used.

In ISO 19289:2015, the classification is (occasionally) completed with an estimated uncertainty due to siting, which has to be added in the uncertainty budget of the measurement. This estimation is coming from bibliographic studies and/or some comparative tests.

The primary objective of this classification is to document the presence of obstacles close to the measurement site.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: