Sky Bear Technical Standards - Home
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

TEMA 2026 Edition – Online Subscription Only

$

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 15SIH, 2nd Edition: Installation and Handling of Spoolable Reinforced Plastic Line Pipe

$

158

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 754, 4th Edition: Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries

$

393

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ASME B31.1-2020: Power Piping

$

668

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ASME B31.1-2022: Power Piping

$

668

BUY NOW

ISO 4965:2012

ISO 4965:2012 Metallic materials – Dynamic force calibration for uniaxial fatigue testing – Part 1: Testing systems

CDN $193.00

SKU: b99ef72fd323 Category:

Description

ISO 4965-1:2012 describes two methods for determining the relationship between the dynamic force range applied to a test-piece in a uniaxial, sinusoidal, constant amplitude test and the force range indicated by the testing system.

These methods are applicable to dynamic testing systems operating away from system resonant frequencies and are relevant to testing systems where the dynamic force measurement errors are either unknown or where they are expected to exceed 1 % of the applied force range.

The dynamic force measurement errors are determined by comparison of the peak forces indicated by the dynamic testing system with those measured by the strain gauged dynamic calibration device (DCD). This DCD has previously undergone static calibration against the testing system indicator.

For Method A (Replica test-piece method), the dynamic calibration is applicable over the validated range of frequencies for that type of test-piece only. A frequency-dependent correction factor is applicable for the correction of dynamic force measurement errors of up to 10 % of dynamic force range. By using such a correction factor, the actual test specimen dynamic force measurement error will be reduced to less than 1 % of the dynamic force range.

For Method B (Compliance envelope method), the dynamic calibration is applicable over the range of test frequencies validated for test-pieces whose compliance lies between those of the two DCDs. No correction factor is applicable, as Method B does not permit dynamic force measurement errors above 1 % of the dynamic force range.

Edition

1

Published Date

2012-07-06

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

13

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 4965-1:2012 describes two methods for determining the relationship between the dynamic force range applied to a test-piece in a uniaxial, sinusoidal, constant amplitude test and the force range indicated by the testing system.

These methods are applicable to dynamic testing systems operating away from system resonant frequencies and are relevant to testing systems where the dynamic force measurement errors are either unknown or where they are expected to exceed 1 % of the applied force range.

The dynamic force measurement errors are determined by comparison of the peak forces indicated by the dynamic testing system with those measured by the strain gauged dynamic calibration device (DCD). This DCD has previously undergone static calibration against the testing system indicator.

For Method A (Replica test-piece method), the dynamic calibration is applicable over the validated range of frequencies for that type of test-piece only. A frequency-dependent correction factor is applicable for the correction of dynamic force measurement errors of up to 10 % of dynamic force range. By using such a correction factor, the actual test specimen dynamic force measurement error will be reduced to less than 1 % of the dynamic force range.

For Method B (Compliance envelope method), the dynamic calibration is applicable over the range of test frequencies validated for test-pieces whose compliance lies between those of the two DCDs. No correction factor is applicable, as Method B does not permit dynamic force measurement errors above 1 % of the dynamic force range.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: