Sky Bear Technical Standards - Home
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 17.6: Amendment 2

$

0

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 23699:2026 Microbeam analysis — Electron backscatter diffraction — Vocabulary

$

129

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 24142:2026 Safe design aspects for machinery in feed processing mills

$

259

BUY NOW

ISO 6272:2011

ISO 6272:2011 Paints and varnishes – Rapid-deformation (impact resistance) tests – Part 2: Falling-weight test, small-area indenter

CDN $85.00

SKU: 3839bea5ca43 Category:

Description

ISO 6272-2:2011 describes a method for evaluating the resistance of a dry film of paint, varnish or related product to cracking or peeling from a substrate when it is subjected to a deformation caused by a falling weight, dropped under standard conditions, acting on a small-area spherical indenter.

NOTE The terms “impact” and “impact resistance” are used in the title and text of ISO 6272-2, but an important characteristic of the apparatus used is that it should produce rapid deformation rather than a true impact.

Because of the poor reproducibility of this test method, the method should be restricted to testing in only one laboratory when the results are expressed as numerical values. Interlaboratory agreement is improved when ranking is used in place of numerical values.

Edition

2

Published Date

2011-08-09

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

5

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 6272-2:2011 describes a method for evaluating the resistance of a dry film of paint, varnish or related product to cracking or peeling from a substrate when it is subjected to a deformation caused by a falling weight, dropped under standard conditions, acting on a small-area spherical indenter.

NOTE The terms "impact" and "impact resistance" are used in the title and text of ISO 6272-2, but an important characteristic of the apparatus used is that it should produce rapid deformation rather than a true impact.

Because of the poor reproducibility of this test method, the method should be restricted to testing in only one laboratory when the results are expressed as numerical values. Interlaboratory agreement is improved when ranking is used in place of numerical values.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: