
ISO 8521:2020
ISO 8521:2020 Glass-reinforced thermosetting plastic (GRP) pipes – Test methods for the determination of the initial circumferential tensile wall strength
CDN $233.00
Description
This document specifies six test methods for the determination of the initial circumferential tensile wall strength per unit of length of glass-reinforced thermosetting plastics (GRP) pipes.
NOTE Another commonly used term for “circumferential tensile strength” is “hoop tensile strength” and the two expressions can be used interchangeably.
The burst test (method A) is suitable for all types and sizes of pipes. It is considered the reference method. However, all the methods in this document have equal validity. If correlation of any of the methods B to F can be established by a comparative test programme, then that method can be considered as the reference method.
The split disc test (method B) is not always suitable for pipes with helically wound reinforcing layers.
The strip test (method C), the modified strip test (method D) and the restrained strip test (method E) are suitable for pipes with a nominal size of DN 500 and greater.
The notched plate test (method F) is primarily intended for use with helically wound pipes of nominal size greater than DN 500 with a winding angle other than approximately 90°.
Results from one method are not necessarily equal to the results derived from any of the alternative methods.
If required, the initial circumferential tensile modulus can be determined by method A.
Edition
3
Published Date
2020-07-09
Status
PUBLISHED
Pages
20
Format 
Secure PDF
Secure – PDF details
- Save your file locally or view it via a web viewer
- Viewing permissions are restricted exclusively to the purchaser
- Device limits - 3
- Printing – Enabled only to print (1) copy
See more about our Environmental Commitment
Abstract
This document specifies six test methods for the determination of the initial circumferential tensile wall strength per unit of length of glass-reinforced thermosetting plastics (GRP) pipes.
NOTE Another commonly used term for "circumferential tensile strength" is "hoop tensile strength" and the two expressions can be used interchangeably.
The burst test (method A) is suitable for all types and sizes of pipes. It is considered the reference method. However, all the methods in this document have equal validity. If correlation of any of the methods B to F can be established by a comparative test programme, then that method can be considered as the reference method.
The split disc test (method B) is not always suitable for pipes with helically wound reinforcing layers.
The strip test (method C), the modified strip test (method D) and the restrained strip test (method E) are suitable for pipes with a nominal size of DN 500 and greater.
The notched plate test (method F) is primarily intended for use with helically wound pipes of nominal size greater than DN 500 with a winding angle other than approximately 90°.
Results from one method are not necessarily equal to the results derived from any of the alternative methods.
If required, the initial circumferential tensile modulus can be determined by method A.
Previous Editions
Can’t find what you are looking for?
Please contact us at:
Related Documents
-

ISO 5078:2025 Management of terminology resources – Terminology extraction
CDN $233.00 Add to cart -

ISO 16840:2006 Wheelchair seating – Part 1: Vocabulary, reference axis convention and measures for body segments, posture and postural support surfaces
CDN $351.00 Add to cart -

ISO 80004:2011 Nanotechnologies – Vocabulary – Part 5: Nano/bio interface
CDN $76.00 Add to cart -

ISO 15424:2025 Information technology – Automatic identification and data capture techniques – Data carrier identifiers (including symbology identifiers)
CDN $233.00 Add to cart







