Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-6 Chapter 6 – Density

$

204

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 560: Fired Heaters for General Refinery Services

$

721

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 64: Diverter Equipment Systems

$

324

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 17.10.1: Refrigerated Light Hydrocarbon Fluids – Measurement of Cargoes on Board LNG Carries

$

417

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 13B-1: Testing Water-based Drilling Fluids

$

418

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-12 Chapter 12 – Thermal Conductivity

$

214

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API 16FI Frac Iron Guidelines and Requirements

$

129

BUY NOW

ISO 8521:2020

ISO 8521:2020 Glass-reinforced thermosetting plastic (GRP) pipes – Test methods for the determination of the initial circumferential tensile wall strength

CDN $233.00

SKU: d9d4693c5ac9 Categories: ,

Description

This document specifies six test methods for the determination of the initial circumferential tensile wall strength per unit of length of glass-reinforced thermosetting plastics (GRP) pipes.

NOTE Another commonly used term for “circumferential tensile strength” is “hoop tensile strength” and the two expressions can be used interchangeably.

The burst test (method A) is suitable for all types and sizes of pipes. It is considered the reference method. However, all the methods in this document have equal validity. If correlation of any of the methods B to F can be established by a comparative test programme, then that method can be considered as the reference method.

The split disc test (method B) is not always suitable for pipes with helically wound reinforcing layers.

The strip test (method C), the modified strip test (method D) and the restrained strip test (method E) are suitable for pipes with a nominal size of DN 500 and greater.

The notched plate test (method F) is primarily intended for use with helically wound pipes of nominal size greater than DN 500 with a winding angle other than approximately 90°.

Results from one method are not necessarily equal to the results derived from any of the alternative methods.

If required, the initial circumferential tensile modulus can be determined by method A.

Edition

3

Published Date

2020-07-09

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

20

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document specifies six test methods for the determination of the initial circumferential tensile wall strength per unit of length of glass-reinforced thermosetting plastics (GRP) pipes.

NOTE Another commonly used term for "circumferential tensile strength" is "hoop tensile strength" and the two expressions can be used interchangeably.

The burst test (method A) is suitable for all types and sizes of pipes. It is considered the reference method. However, all the methods in this document have equal validity. If correlation of any of the methods B to F can be established by a comparative test programme, then that method can be considered as the reference method.

The split disc test (method B) is not always suitable for pipes with helically wound reinforcing layers.

The strip test (method C), the modified strip test (method D) and the restrained strip test (method E) are suitable for pipes with a nominal size of DN 500 and greater.

The notched plate test (method F) is primarily intended for use with helically wound pipes of nominal size greater than DN 500 with a winding angle other than approximately 90°.

Results from one method are not necessarily equal to the results derived from any of the alternative methods.

If required, the initial circumferential tensile modulus can be determined by method A.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: