Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-6 Chapter 6 – Density

$

204

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 560: Fired Heaters for General Refinery Services

$

721

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 64: Diverter Equipment Systems

$

324

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 17.10.1: Refrigerated Light Hydrocarbon Fluids – Measurement of Cargoes on Board LNG Carries

$

417

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 13B-1: Testing Water-based Drilling Fluids

$

418

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-12 Chapter 12 – Thermal Conductivity

$

214

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API 16FI Frac Iron Guidelines and Requirements

$

129

BUY NOW

ISO 10399:2017

ISO 10399:2017 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Duo-trio test

CDN $233.00

SKU: 863befad01be Category:

Description

ISO 10399:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.

The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.

The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.

The method is effective for

a) determining that

  1. either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
  2. a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and

b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

Two forms of the method are described:

– the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);

– the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.

Edition

3

Published Date

2017-12-07

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

21

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 10399:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.

The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.

The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.

The method is effective for

a) determining that

  1. either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
  2. a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and

b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

Two forms of the method are described:

- the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);

- the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: