Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-6 Chapter 6 – Density

$

204

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 560: Fired Heaters for General Refinery Services

$

721

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 64: Diverter Equipment Systems

$

324

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 17.10.1: Refrigerated Light Hydrocarbon Fluids – Measurement of Cargoes on Board LNG Carries

$

417

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 13B-1: Testing Water-based Drilling Fluids

$

418

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API Technical Report TDB-12 Chapter 12 – Thermal Conductivity

$

214

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API 16FI Frac Iron Guidelines and Requirements

$

129

BUY NOW

ISO 18640:2018

ISO 18640:2018 Protective clothing for firefighters – Physiological impact – Part 2: Determination of physiological heat load caused by protective clothing worn by firefighters

CDN $173.00

Description

This document specifies a method for evaluating the thermo-physiological impact of protective fabric ensembles and potentially protective clothing ensembles in a simulated activity under defined relevant conditions for firefighters.

This document is intended to be used to assess the thermo-physiological impact of protective fabric ensembles and potentially protective clothing ensembles but not the risk for heat stress due to actual fire conditions. The results of this test method can be used as elements of characterisation and comparison of thermo-physiological impact of various types of protective fabric ensembles and potentially protective clothing ensembles.

Default measurements are undertaken on fabric samples representing the garment or protective clothing combination. Optionally and in addition to the standard test method, the same testing protocol can be applied to characterise protective clothing ensembles including underwear, air layers and certain design features[1]. In addition measurements on readymade garments are optionally possible.

NOTE The presently used evaluation methods are only validated for structural firefighting garments.

[1] A study conducted at Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Switzerland) showed good correlation between results of standard torso tests (without both underwear and air layers on fabrics) to tests on fabrics with underwear, tests on fabrics with underwear and air layers and test on readymade garments (with underwear and with or without air layers) of the same material composition. Due to the different thermal insulation of the systems direct comparison of the results is not possible.

Edition

1

Published Date

2018-05-11

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

17

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document specifies a method for evaluating the thermo-physiological impact of protective fabric ensembles and potentially protective clothing ensembles in a simulated activity under defined relevant conditions for firefighters.

This document is intended to be used to assess the thermo-physiological impact of protective fabric ensembles and potentially protective clothing ensembles but not the risk for heat stress due to actual fire conditions. The results of this test method can be used as elements of characterisation and comparison of thermo-physiological impact of various types of protective fabric ensembles and potentially protective clothing ensembles.

Default measurements are undertaken on fabric samples representing the garment or protective clothing combination. Optionally and in addition to the standard test method, the same testing protocol can be applied to characterise protective clothing ensembles including underwear, air layers and certain design features[1]. In addition measurements on readymade garments are optionally possible.

NOTE The presently used evaluation methods are only validated for structural firefighting garments.

[1] A study conducted at Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Switzerland) showed good correlation between results of standard torso tests (without both underwear and air layers on fabrics) to tests on fabrics with underwear, tests on fabrics with underwear and air layers and test on readymade garments (with underwear and with or without air layers) of the same material composition. Due to the different thermal insulation of the systems direct comparison of the results is not possible.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: