Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 521: Guide for Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems – Edition 6

$

682

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 653: Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction – Edition 4

$

507

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:19 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series-18: Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z246.2-14 – Emergency preparedness and response for petroleum and natural gas industry systems

$

596

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:22 – Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z731-09 (R2014) – Emergency Preparedness and Response

$

177

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:23 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:26 – Storage of Hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA B51:24 Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Pressure Piping Code

$

389

BUY NOW

ISO 5495:2005

ISO 5495:2005 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Paired comparison test

CDN $251.00

SKU: 285e48ecd067 Category:

Description

ISO 5495:2005 describes a procedure for determining whether there exists a perceptible sensory difference or a similarity between samples of two products concerning the intensity of a sensory attribute. This test is sometimes also referred to as a directional difference test or a 2-AFC test (Alternative Forced Choice). In fact, the paired comparison test is a forced choice test between two alternatives.

The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several, which means that it enables determination of whether there exists a perceptible difference concerning a given attribute, and the specification of the direction of difference, but it does not give any indication of the extent of that difference. The absence of difference for the attribute under study does not signify that there does not exist any difference between the two products.

This method is only applicable if the products are relatively homogeneous.

The method is effective (1) for determining whether a perceptible difference exists (paired difference test), or whether no perceptible difference exists (paired similarity test) when, for example, modifications are made to ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage operations, or (2) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

It is necessary to know, prior to carrying out the test, whether the test is a one-sided test (the test supervisor knows a priori the direction of the difference, and the alternative hypothesis corresponds to the existence of a difference in the expected direction) or a two-sided test (the test supervisor does not have any a priori knowledge concerning the direction of the difference, and the alternative hypothesis corresponds to the existence of a difference in one direction or the other).

Edition

3

Published Date

2005-11-10

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

21

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 5495:2005 describes a procedure for determining whether there exists a perceptible sensory difference or a similarity between samples of two products concerning the intensity of a sensory attribute. This test is sometimes also referred to as a directional difference test or a 2-AFC test (Alternative Forced Choice). In fact, the paired comparison test is a forced choice test between two alternatives.

The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several, which means that it enables determination of whether there exists a perceptible difference concerning a given attribute, and the specification of the direction of difference, but it does not give any indication of the extent of that difference. The absence of difference for the attribute under study does not signify that there does not exist any difference between the two products.

This method is only applicable if the products are relatively homogeneous.

The method is effective (1) for determining whether a perceptible difference exists (paired difference test), or whether no perceptible difference exists (paired similarity test) when, for example, modifications are made to ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage operations, or (2) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

It is necessary to know, prior to carrying out the test, whether the test is a one-sided test (the test supervisor knows a priori the direction of the difference, and the alternative hypothesis corresponds to the existence of a difference in the expected direction) or a two-sided test (the test supervisor does not have any a priori knowledge concerning the direction of the difference, and the alternative hypothesis corresponds to the existence of a difference in one direction or the other).

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: