REGISTER

FR
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 11P: Packaged Reciprocating Compressors

$

276

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 2CCU: Offshore Cargo Carrying Units

$

197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

MSS SP-116-2025: Service-Line Valves and Fittings for Drinking Water Systems

$

221

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 650: Welded Tanks for Oil Storage

$

1336

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 3000: Classifying and Loading of Crude Oil into Rail Tank Cars

$

237

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 1637: API Color-symbol System to Identify Equipment, Vehicles, and Transfer Points

$

79

BUY NOW

API TR 579-A

API Technical Report 579-A : Development of FEA-based Reference Stress Solutions for Level 2 and Level 3 Crack Assessments

CDN $189.00

This publication was last reviewed and confirmed in 2025.

Description

This research study provides background information that may be used to revise the Fitness-For-Service (FFS) document, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 (aka “API 579”), more specifically the Part 9 Level 2 Assessment, along with a new Level 3 option for Part 9.

The Part 9 Level 2 crack-like flaw FFS procedure relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach, which is the most widely used crack assessment methodology in the world. Several industry standards for crack assessment implement the FAD approach, including BS 7910 from the British Standards Institute and the R6 document from the British nuclear power generation industry.

The FAD approach was first introduced in 1976 as a simple approximation for fracture stability assessment of structural components that experience plastic deformation prior to failure. Modern industry standards use improved versions of the FAD, but the approach still contains approximations and simplifications.

The main purpose of the present work is to remove some of the approximations in the existing Part 9 Level 2 FAD procedure and thereby improve accuracy. A side benefit of this work is a new Level 3 option that is even more accurate than the improved Level 2 procedure. This study includes a large number of 3D elastic-plastic Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of components with cracks.

 

Edition

1

Published Date

2025-05-03

Status

Current

Pages

131

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This research study provides background information that may be used to revise the Fitness-For-Service (FFS) document, API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 (aka “API 579”), more specifically the Part 9 Level 2 Assessment, along with a new Level 3 option for Part 9. The Part 9 Level 2 crack-like flaw FFS procedure relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach, which is the most widely used crack assessment methodology in the world. Several industry standards for crack assessment implement the FAD approach, including BS 7910 from the British Standards Institute and the R6 document from the British nuclear power generation industry. The FAD approach was first introduced in 1976 as a simple approximation for fracture stability assessment of structural components that experience plastic deformation prior to failure. Modern industry standards use improved versions of the FAD, but the approach still contains approximations and simplifications. The main purpose of the present work is to remove some of the approximations in the existing Part 9 Level 2 FAD procedure and thereby improve accuracy. A side benefit of this work is a new Level 3 option that is even more accurate than the improved Level 2 procedure. This study includes a large number of 3D elastic-plastic Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of components with cracks.  

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: