Sky Bear Technical Standards - Home
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CAN/CSA-Z900.2.3:22 – Perfusable organs for transplantation

$

181

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CAN/CSA-Z900.2.4:22 – Ocular tissues for transplantation

$

142

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CAN/CSA-Z900.2.5:22 – Lymphohematopoietic cells for transplantation

$

181

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CAN/CSA-Z902:25 – Blood and blood components

$

354

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z91:26 – Health and safety code for suspended equipment operations

$

268

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

Z94.1-15 (R2025) – Industrial protective headwear – Performance, selection, care, and use

$

158

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z94.2:26 – Hearing protection devices – Performance, selection, care, and use

$

244

BUY NOW

API TR 579-B

API TR 579-B, 1st Edition: KPECE2 Influence Coefficients Study

CDN $126.00

This publication was last reviewed and confirmed in 2026.

KPECE2 Influence Coefficients Study

SKU: c6b54a8ab75b Category:

Description

This research study provides background information that may be used to revise the Fitness-For-Service (FFS) document,
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 (aka “API 579”), more specifically the Part 9 Level 2 Assessment, along with a new Level 3 option for Part 9.

The Part 9 Level 2 crack-like flaw FFS procedure relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach, which is the most widely used crack assessment methodology in the world. Several industry standards for crack assessment implement the FAD approach, including BS 7910 from the British Standards Institute and the R6 document from the British nuclear power generation industry.

The FAD approach was first introduced in 1976 as a simple approximation for fracture stability assessment of structural components that experience plastic deformation prior to failure. Modern industry standards use improved versions of the FAD, but the approach still contains approximations and simplifications.

The main purpose of the present work is to remove some of the approximations in the existing Part 9 Level 2 FAD procedure and thereby improve accuracy. A side benefit of this work is a new Level 3 option that is even more accurate than the improved Level 2 procedure. This study includes a large number of 3D elastic plastic Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of components with cracks.

 

Edition

1

Published Date

2026-05-02

Status

Current

Pages

49

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This research study provides background information that may be used to revise the Fitness-For-Service (FFS) document,
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 (aka “API 579”), more specifically the Part 9 Level 2 Assessment, along with a new Level 3 option for Part 9.

The Part 9 Level 2 crack-like flaw FFS procedure relies on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach, which is the most widely used crack assessment methodology in the world. Several industry standards for crack assessment implement the FAD approach, including BS 7910 from the British Standards Institute and the R6 document from the British nuclear power generation industry.

The FAD approach was first introduced in 1976 as a simple approximation for fracture stability assessment of structural components that experience plastic deformation prior to failure. Modern industry standards use improved versions of the FAD, but the approach still contains approximations and simplifications.

The main purpose of the present work is to remove some of the approximations in the existing Part 9 Level 2 FAD procedure and thereby improve accuracy. A side benefit of this work is a new Level 3 option that is even more accurate than the improved Level 2 procedure. This study includes a large number of 3D elastic plastic Finite Element Analyses (FEA) of components with cracks.

 

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: