Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 521: Guide for Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Systems – Edition 6

$

682

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API STD 653: Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction – Edition 4

$

507

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:19 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series-18: Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z246.2-14 – Emergency preparedness and response for petroleum and natural gas industry systems

$

596

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:22 – Storage of hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z731-09 (R2014) – Emergency Preparedness and Response

$

177

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z662:23 – Oil and gas pipeline systems

$

1197

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA Z341 Series:26 – Storage of Hydrocarbons in underground formations

$

878

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

CSA B51:24 Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Pressure Piping Code

$

389

BUY NOW

ISO 8588:2017

ISO 8588:2017 Sensory analysis – Methodology – “A” – “not A” test

CDN $186.00

SKU: 54c7f0817fda Category:

Description

ISO 8588:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference exists between samples of two products. The method applies whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several.

The “A” ? “not A” test can be used in sensory analysis in the following ways:

a) as a difference test, particularly for evaluating samples having variations, for example, in appearance (making it difficult to obtain strictly identical repeat samples) or in aftertaste (making direct comparison difficult);

b) as a recognition test, particularly for determining whether an assessor or group of assessors identifies a new stimulus in relation to a known stimulus (for example, recognition of the quality of the sweet taste of a new sweetener);

c) as a perception test, to determine the ability of an assessor to discriminate stimuli.

The “A” ? “not A” test is not appropriate for assessing if two products are sufficiently similar to be used interchangeably (i.e. for similarity testing) because the “A” ? “not A” test inherently involves replicate evaluations of the same products by all assessors. These replicate evaluations violate the basic assumptions for similarity tests to be statistically valid.

Examples of its application are given in Annex B.

NOTE Bi and Ennis[1] point out that the estimate of the discriminal distance, d’, between the “A” and “not A” samples is the same regardless of the nature of the replicated evaluations performed in the test but that the estimate of the variance of d’ does depend on how the replicate evaluations were performed. As such, no general discussion of a Thurstonian analysis of the “A” ? “not A” method, nor of the power of the test is undertaken in this document. Interested readers are referred to Reference [1] for a detailed discussion of the topic.

Edition

2

Published Date

2017-07-21

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

13

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

ISO 8588:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference exists between samples of two products. The method applies whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several.

The "A" ? "not A" test can be used in sensory analysis in the following ways:

a) as a difference test, particularly for evaluating samples having variations, for example, in appearance (making it difficult to obtain strictly identical repeat samples) or in aftertaste (making direct comparison difficult);

b) as a recognition test, particularly for determining whether an assessor or group of assessors identifies a new stimulus in relation to a known stimulus (for example, recognition of the quality of the sweet taste of a new sweetener);

c) as a perception test, to determine the ability of an assessor to discriminate stimuli.

The "A" ? "not A" test is not appropriate for assessing if two products are sufficiently similar to be used interchangeably (i.e. for similarity testing) because the "A" ? "not A" test inherently involves replicate evaluations of the same products by all assessors. These replicate evaluations violate the basic assumptions for similarity tests to be statistically valid.

Examples of its application are given in Annex B.

NOTE Bi and Ennis[1] point out that the estimate of the discriminal distance, d', between the "A" and "not A" samples is the same regardless of the nature of the replicated evaluations performed in the test but that the estimate of the variance of d' does depend on how the replicate evaluations were performed. As such, no general discussion of a Thurstonian analysis of the "A" ? "not A" method, nor of the power of the test is undertaken in this document. Interested readers are referred to Reference [1] for a detailed discussion of the topic.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: