Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 10.8, 3rd Edition: Standard Test Method for Sediment in Crude Oil by Membrane Filtration

$

114

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO/TR 42505:2026 Sharing economy — Shared manufacturing — Concepts and models

$

192

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

ISO 4306-1:2026 Cranes — Vocabulary — Part 1: General

$

436

BUY NOW

ISO 16820:2019

ISO 16820:2019 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Sequential analysis

CDN $131.00

SKU: f234367486f2 Category:

Description

This document specifies a procedure for statistically analysing data from forced-choice sensory discrimination tests, such as the triangle, duo-trio, 3-AFC, 2-AFC, in which after every trial of the discrimination test the decision can be made to stop testing and declare a difference, to stop testing and declare no difference, or to continue testing.

The sequential method often allows for a decision to be made after fewer trials of the discrimination test than would be required by conventional approaches that use predetermined numbers of assessments.

The method is effective for:

a) determining that either:

  1. a perceptible difference results; or
  2. a perceptible difference does not result when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage;

b) selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

N

Edition

2

Published Date

2019-10-03

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

10

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document specifies a procedure for statistically analysing data from forced-choice sensory discrimination tests, such as the triangle, duo-trio, 3-AFC, 2-AFC, in which after every trial of the discrimination test the decision can be made to stop testing and declare a difference, to stop testing and declare no difference, or to continue testing.

The sequential method often allows for a decision to be made after fewer trials of the discrimination test than would be required by conventional approaches that use predetermined numbers of assessments.

The method is effective for:

a) determining that either:

  1. a perceptible difference results; or
  2. a perceptible difference does not result when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage;

b) selecting, training and monitoring assessors.

N

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: